Category: Blog

List of blog posts

Part 3: From Public Purpose to Digital Access

Roman architecture was never only about engineering marvels—it was about serving the people.

  • Aqueducts carried water into cities, powering daily life and public health.
  • Forums became centers of democracy, enabling civic discourse.
  • Public baths weren’t just about hygiene—they built community and connection.

Every structure was designed for a public purpose, empowering citizens and improving lives at scale.

AWS Services as Digital Public Infrastructure

AWS generative AI reflects this civic philosophy by democratizing access to cutting-edge models through cloud-native services. Instead of aqueducts and forums, we have APIs and managed services that distribute intelligence and capability:

  • Amazon Bedrock
    Provides serverless APIs to foundation models from providers like Anthropic, Meta, Cohere, and Mistral. Developers don’t need to manage infrastructure or train massive models—they can instantly consume them, just as Roman citizens accessed aqueduct water without needing to understand the engineering behind it.
  • Amazon SageMaker
    Functions as the forum for builders and scientists. It offers a collaborative environment to build, train, fine-tune, and deploy custom generative AI models. Features like SageMaker Studio, JumpStart, and Model Registryensure that teams can innovate together with governance and efficiency.
  • Inferentia & Trainium Chips
    These custom AWS chips are the concrete and aqueduct channels of today’s AI infrastructure. They provide high-performance, cost-optimized inference and training for generative models. By lowering compute costs, they make AI more accessible to startups and enterprises alike.
  • Amazon API Gateway & Lambda
    Think of these as the digital conduits—akin to aqueduct pipes—that distribute AI capabilities to millions of users via apps, websites, and services, without requiring heavy infrastructure investments.
  • Amazon OpenSearch & Kendra
    These services act like the forums of old—organizing and retrieving information so that people can ask questions and access knowledge easily. When paired with generative AI, they enable natural language search and contextual insights across massive data sets.

The Legacy Parallel

Roman concrete still holds strong after 2,000 years, a testament to their vision for longevity. Similarly, AWS’s cloud-native AI stack—built on principles of scalability, modularity, and sustainability—ensures innovation can endure and adapt for generations of technology.

Both remind us that the greatest architectures, whether carved in stone or provisioned in code, are those that serve people broadly and meaningfully.

This concludes the three part comparison of Roman architecture to AWS generative AI services.

Part 2: From Arches to Pipelines

The genius of Roman engineering wasn’t just in their monuments—it was in their patterns.

  • Arches distributed heavy loads with elegance.
  • Domes enclosed vast spaces without collapsing.
  • Concrete gave them strength, flexibility, and the ability to scale construction.

These patterns were reusable, adaptable, and reliable—allowing Rome to expand from one city into an empire.

In the digital world, AWS generative AI applies the same principle of reusable patterns:

  • SageMaker pipelines are today’s arches—distributing workflows, balancing complexity, and channeling resources efficiently.
  • Bedrock APIs are modern domes—enclosing sophisticated models in simple, accessible interfaces.
  • Inferentia and Trainium chips are the new concrete—providing a durable foundation of performance and efficiency.

Both Rome and AWS solved the same problem: how do you build something that scales reliably without reinventing from scratch every time?

Great design is timeless—whether in stone or in code.

From Arches to Algorithms: Foundations Across Time

When we think of Roman architecture, what comes to mind? Colosseums, aqueducts, and basilicas—structures that stood the test of time. The Romans weren’t just building for beauty. They engineered for symmetry, durability, and public utility. Their aqueducts carried water across miles with remarkable precision, and their basilicas and forums became centers of civic life and governance.

Now, fast forward nearly 2,000 years. Today’s architects of generative AI face a very different medium—code and cloud instead of stone and marble—but the design questions aren’t so different.

In the world of AWS generative AI, the foundations are about scalability and modularity. Instead of concrete and arches, we build with services like:

  • Amazon SageMaker for streamlined training and deployment, bringing together widely adopted AWS machine learning (ML) and analytics capabilities, the next generation of Amazon SageMaker delivers an integrated experience for analytics and AI with unified access to all your data. Collaborate and build faster from a unified studio using familiar AWS tools for model development in SageMaker AI (including HyperPod, JumpStart, and MLOps), generative AI, data processing, and SQL analytics, accelerated by Amazon Q Developer, the most capable generative AI assistant for software development. Access all your data whether it’s stored in data lakes, data warehouses, or third-party or federated data sources, with governance built in to meet enterprise security needs.

  • Amazon Bedrock for direct access to generative AI models via APIs. Amazon Bedrock is a comprehensive, secure, and flexible service for building generative AI applications and agents. Amazon Bedrock connects you to leading foundation models (FMs), services to deploy and operate agents, and tools for fine-tuning, safeguarding, and optimizing models along with knowledge bases to connect applications to your latest data so that you have everything you need to quickly move from experimentation to real-world deployment.

  • AWS Inferentia chips to deliver cost-efficient performance at scale. AWS Inferentia chips are designed by AWS to deliver high performance at the lowest cost in Amazon EC2 for your deep learning (DL) and generative AI inference applications. 

Just as Roman engineers thought about structures that would last for centuries, AWS engineers design digital systems that can scale globally, adapt instantly, and endure change.

The underlying truth is timeless: whether in stone or in cloud, strong foundations determine what endures. Rome’s enduring arches echo in today’s scalable pipelines. Both ask the same question: what can we build today that will still matter tomorrow?

Generative AI and Upanishads

It had been my long term interest to read about Upanishads but the books that were available required patient reading and a scholar to dissect the details. However with the recent availability of GenAI assistants, it has become easy for me (one or two verses daily) to not only learn, but have an healthy debate on various thoughts. Till date, I completed the Kena and Isha upanishads and getting into Katha upanishad where it talks about the conversation between Yama and Nachiketa (This is a great story for another time) and highlights the importance of Atman/Self.

At work, we talk a lot about Generative AI as I am sure everyone in the tech industry does these days. So this morning, as I was listening to the verse it struct me the similarities/differences between the Upanishads description of self and its relevance in Generative AI.

The Self in the Upanishads and the “Self” in Generative AI

In the timeless wisdom of the Upanishads, the Self (Ātman) is described as eternal, unchanging, and the very essence of existence. In contrast, the “self” of Generative AI (GenAI) is a construct of algorithms, parameters, and data—a sophisticated simulation of individuality, but never essence.

Eternal vs. Constructed: The Upanishadic Self is unborn and indestructible. AI’s “self” is engineered, temporary, and bound by training.

Knowledge vs. Pattern: The Rishis spoke of Vidya—direct realization of truth. AI operates by recognizing patterns, not experiencing reality.

Unity vs. Multiplicity: Tat Tvam Asi—all beings are one. GenAI fragments itself into multiple identities, each session a new persona.

Liberation vs. Dependence: The realized Self leads to freedom (moksha). AI’s agency is tethered to human input and cannot transcend its code.

Reflection for Today: As AI grows more human-like, we must not confuse simulation with essence. The Upanishads remind us that while AI may reflect our creativity, only Self-realization reveals who we truly are.

Stable Coins and Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs)

Stablecoins are like money market funds, they’re like bank deposits. But they’re to some extent outside the regulatory perimeter, and it’s appropriate that they be regulated

– Jerome Powell

In the past several posts, I have provided background on the various aspects of the Web 3.0 ecosystem. We will focus on Stable Coins and Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) in this post.

Stable Coins

Stable coins are privately-issued cryptocurrency that maintains stable value relative to another asset for e.g., USD, Euro, Fiat-collateralized stable coins. These types of cryptocurrencies were created to provide an alternative to cryptocurrencies.

*Source: 101blockchains.com

Stable coins aims to mimic traditional currencies and is typically a cryptocurrency that is collateralized by the value of an underlying asset. The lure of these coins are that these are not subject to the extreme price volatility that many other cryptocurrencies encounter. For e.g., last November one Bitcoin was worth $66k and the same one Bitcoin is worth $24k today (8/13/2022). However, if you compare one Tether ( one of the stablecoins) was worth $1.03 last November and it is at $1 today (8/13/2022).

From a business owner perspective, if someone buys a product with a cryptocurrency like Bitcoin, they need to convert it to a Fiat currency to keep the value stable. Some exchanges don’t allow this conversion. Stablecoins serve this purpose to ensure the values are maintained in spite of the fluctuations in cryptocurrencies.

There are four types of Stable-coins:

    • Fiat-Collateralized 
      • Most of the stablecoins are backed by fiat currency. What this means is that, for every single stablecoin, there is a corresponding fiat currency held in a bank account. If an investor wants to convert their stablecoin to a fiat currency, the exchange will withdraw the fiat currency held in the bank and pay the investor the fiat currency. Then burn the equivalent stablecoin to maintain the balance. This simplicity has great advantages as everyone can understand the cryptocurrencies easily that would allow for more adoption. Most common are Tether, USDC, Gemini Dollar (GUSD) and Pax Dollar(USDP).
    • Commodity-Collateralized
      • These are collateralized with other kinds of interchangeable assets. The most common commodity is Gold. There are other stablecoins backed by oil, real estate and various precious metals. The owners are exposed to the value of real-world asset. They have potential to appreciate or depreciate over time. They are marketed as a way to allow smaller investors to enter some asset classes like Real Estate. Common stablecoins in this category are Digix Gold (DGX) and SwissRealCoin(SRC) backed by Swiss real estate.
    • Crypto-Collateralized
      • These stablecoins are backed by other cryptocurrencies. They are more decentralized since the collateral lies within the same blockchain. To reduce volatility risks, they are over-collateralized to absorb market fluctuations. For e.g., if we need to buy $100 worth of stablecoins, it has be collateralized with $200 worth of cryptocurrencies.  If the underlying cryptocurrency loses value, to some extent the owners can be compensated but if it is too low, the stablecoin is liquidated. They are very complex and therefore didn’t take off like fiat-collateralized stablecoins. One example is Dai which was initially backed by Ethereal (ETH).
    • Non-Collateralized
      • These are not backed by anything and may seem scary. However, if you look at US dollar today, which isn’t backed by anything and used to be backed by gold decades ago. These cryptocurrencies are driven by the algorithms, that adjust based on the demand and allow the coin to be minted/generated. One example is Ampleforth (AMPL) that adjusts its algorithms to supply the coins based on the daily demand.

The benefits are stablecoins include:

    • Potential for day to day currency like fiat currency
    • smart contracts allow for better managing the payment workflows
    • Fast and affordable money transfers across borders for migrant workers
    • Protection against fiat currency devaluation and market volatility
    • Facilitating Decentralized Forex (DeFo)

There are some limitations which include:

    • Recent scandal with Tether really clouded the way the stablecoin issuers were operating behind the scenes but regulation should mitigate this concern
    • To enable trust, an independent third part audit is mandatory
    • Fiat backed stablecoins are again tied up with the regulation on the fiat side
    • Crypto pegged stablecoins have their own issues due to volatility

Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs):

Central Bank Digital Currencies, CBDCs as they are called are nothing but the digital token or electronic record of a country’s official currency. They are not stablecoins but can fill a similar role. The difference is that the CBDCs are issued and controlled by the Central Bank of the country. They could be exchanged one for one with their equivalent fiat and likely to be considered legal tender. This can reduce the cost of managing cash (yes it requires  raw material, metals to print money) and promote financial inclusion to the underserved communities that don’t have access to any financial institutions in their location. Nigeria has a working CBDC called eNaira while China (digital yuan, called e-CNY) and other countries are running trials to vet it out.

The following diagram illustrates the future of CBDCs.

Source: Digital Asset

There are many benefits in this flow including better identification of money laundering, inclusion of underserved communities and potential for innovative payment systems and financial services.

This concludes the review of stablecoins and CBDCs. We will pick up the creator economy and NFS next time.

 

4b: Decentralized Finance (DeFi) – Cryptocurrencies

“If you don’t believe it or don’t get it, I don’t have the time to try to convince you, sorry.” – Satoshi Nakamoto

We continue our journey into Decentralized Finance (DeFi) with the discussion around Cryptocurrencies and Blockchains. In the past several posts, I have provided background on the various aspects of the Web 3.0 ecosystem.

The timing of this post comes in the heels of the recent development in Terra Luna and UST  which in itself is terrible but not a death knell for cryptocurrency. I approach the cryptocurrency subject as a technological innovation rather than a speculative asset class. If you recall the dot com boom, there was innovation and fraud that permeated the system and eventually some companies came out of it successfully. We can see similar situation here. Let’s get back to our learning on the Web 3.0 and focus on cryptocurrencies.

What is Cryptocurrency?

According to Wikipedia, Cryptocurrency is a digital currency designed to work as a medium of exchange through a computer network that is not reliant on any central authority, such as a government or bank to uphold and maintain it.

There are three key characteristics that makes it difficult to dismiss the importance of cryptos.

      1. Trustless – Since the system is peer-to-peer, no trust between the sender and recipient is required. In addition, the incentives for the miners is adequate enough to not defraud the users but to add it to the blockchain resulting in the integrity of the environment.
      2. Immutable – Transaction cannot be reverted since it is permanently recorded in the ledger and transmitted across all nodes.
      3. Decentralized – No central agency that controls the creation of the new coins or transfer of the coins from one entity to another. Granted exchanges facilitate those transfers but there are multiple exchanges and a user can go to any exchange to get the task completed without having rely on only one.

Let’s take an example of sending money from one country to another country through wire. The processing has the following steps and it will take at least five business days (may change depending not the recipient country) for the recipient to get the payment.

The central banks/correspondent banks act as intermediaries to oversee the payments to or from the senders/receiver. Now let’s review how Cryptocurrency works.

 

Making sense of bitcoin and blockchain technology: PwC

In this peer to peer system, because there is no central agency, the entities easily transfer their resources (currencies) to make an entry or exit on the positions. As a result, the payments are near real time. Bitcoin transactions can take place within 10 to 15 minutes, Ethereum within five minutes and so on. The quickness of the transfers is unbelievable and liquidity is instantaneous.

Another benefit would be to prevent corrupt and oppressive governments intervening and siphoning off funds from the citizens. By using cryptocurrencies, the citizens can protect their wealth since it will be stored in their wallets with the private keys that is not accessible by the governments. They can migrate to other countries and liquidate the cryptocurrencies without any issue.

Requires just internet and anyone can begin transacting with the cryptocurrencies. Today there are over 300+ million users and this is huge considering there were zero users a decade ago.

Global Cryptocurrency Courtesy: Small business blog

The adoption rates are comparable to the internet growth

cryptocurrency

Courtesy: Small business blog

Numerous brands and companies are accepting the crypto payments. Here is a list that may not be exhaustive for Bitcoin payments.

Who Accepts Bitcoin - Infographic

Courtesy: Spendmenot

Why do they matter?

      • Cryptocurrencies allow low cost, nearly instantaneous, borderless, peer-to-peer transfers of actual value
      • Low barrier to entry and not subject to business hours in mainstream financial institutions
      • Payment blockchains open up access to financial services to unbanked/underserved people worldwide
      • Mobile wallets make it cheaper for immigrants to transfer money to their homeland
      • Can provide safer store of value in countries with hyperinflation

The market cap as we speak is hitting $1.3 Trillion which is no joke and of course, the volatility is not for faint of heart. It went up to $3 Trillion last November before coming down to the current levels. Comparing this withUS Stock Exchange that has the market cap of around $53 Trillion, we are at the early stages of a financial asset.

In our next installment we will review other aspects of DeFi like lending, farming etc., Meanwhile I will be taking few weeks off this summer and resume the posts in July. Happy Summer everyone!

Part 4a: Decentralized Finance (DeFi)

DeFi boom is very near equivalent of an apocalyptic event for the traditional financial institutions. – Mohith Agadi

We have reviewed the overall landscape of Web 3.0 in Part 1, reviewed the Web 3.0 applications in Part 2 and Decentralized Autonomous Organizations in Part 3 We will focus on Decentralized Finance (DeFi) in this post.  

  • Web 3.0 applications – Community managed applications 
  • Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) – Community owned governance 
  • Decentralized Finance (DeFi) – Community Finance 
  • Stable-coins and Central Bank Digital Currencies – Fiat collateralized and Government issue digital coins 
  • Creator Economy & Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) – Community creations 
  • Blockchain based games – Community built, created and owned Games 

DeFi is an umbrella term to define building a new internet-native financial system using blockchains to replace traditional intermediaries and trust mechanism. Before we go deeper into DeFi, let’s review what prompted this technology to evolve.  

Let’s travel back in time to 2008 and look at some numbers. 

An infographic representing a headline that reads, "The Great Recession By the Numbers" with a breakdown by numbers of Treasury Department spending, unemployment rate, and more.

Courtesy: The Balance 

We all know how the banks leveraged the housing derivates to over extend and eventually fail to meet their obligations resulting in the monumental financial market downturns. There were many reasons including the greed and lack of oversight but one of the primary reasons which prompted Satoshi Nakamoto to think about a solution is the lack of electronic trails in the banking transactions. There were paper trails for the transactions but nobody can look up to see how a particular real estate has been leveraged, what kind of derivates were issued, who owned them etc., 

While decentralization may be a solution, it had trust and permissionless issues. In centralized transactions, there is one authority that oversees and approves the financial transactions. However, in a decentralized situation, there is no single authority. All the concerned parties may not know each other and by default assumed to be bad actors. There is no reliable way to confirm if the information is factual or fraud. 

 This brings us to the Byzantine General’s problem. Roman Empire has ordered its generals to occupy a castle which has enough supplies to last for a long time. The generals are camped in various directions and there is physical distance between them. Each general acts an independent decision maker but will comply with the messages to attack or hold. It has to be coordinated among themselves. Therefore, trust and communication play an important role. In a centralized network, the central authority ensures that the information is accurate which ensures the dissemination of information across all the nodes. So, the centralized agencies don’t suffer from Byzantine Generals problem but they can become corrupt.  

Bitcoin's Proof of Work: The problem of the Byzantine Generals | by Cos | The Startup | Medium

  

For a long time, decentralized solutions didn’t solve this Byzantine Generals Problem until Satoshi presented the Proof of work mechanism. Simply put, the mechanism had the following, 

    •  The miners in the blockchain acted a generals 
    • Each node must try to validate the transactions which are sent like messages to the generals 
    • The enemy can be thought as bad actors (hackers) who can maliciously write transactions or spend the currency twice 
    • The miners will compete to write a next block by solving cryptographic puzzle and whoever solves it first will get the right and the reward to write the transactions in the block. This is proof of work and has built-in mechanism to reward the work done by the miners. 
    • The blockchain is also decentralized and copies of the ledger is available in all the nodes and the blocks are hashed for security.  
    • The blockchain infrastructure paved way for peer-to-peer transaction in a trustless and permissionless environment. 

As long as there is 51% of node validators accept the truth, it will be approved as valid block for any payment transactions. In order for someone to maliciously insert a transaction, they need 51% control of the network which is nearly impossible because of the geographic spread as well as the unparalleled growth of networks. Even if some nodes go rogue, there is no impact to the overall infrastructure. 

So Bitcoin was created with this and other security measures to kickoff the decentralized technology evolution. In the next post, we will dive deeper into cryptocurrencies. before we pickup the next topic.

Part 3: Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs)

DAO is an entity that lives on a network and exists independently, but also relies heavily on the human person to perform certain tasks that it cannot. – Vitalik Buterin

Let’s continue to explore further in our journey. Check out Part 1 and Part 2 before reading this post.

  • Web 3.0 applications – Community managed applications
  • Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) – Community owned governance
  • Decentralized Finance (DeFi) – Community Finance
  • Stable-coins and Central Bank Digital Currencies – Fiat collateralized and Government issue digital coins
  • Creator Economy & Non Fungible Tokens (NFTs) – Community creations
  • Blockchain based games – Community built, created and owned Games

Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs):

Before we review the merits of DAO, it is important to review the challenges in a centralized system. Every publicly traded companies are centrally organized with a CEO at the top. As such, it is important for the CEO to be ethical, trustworthy, and showcase a flawless image to the public. Otherwise, we have seen how Elon Musk’s interview while smoking marijuana evaporated $4 billion Tesla stock. Or how Lukin Coffe’s revenues catapulted the company stock to $24 and fell down to $2.40 after it was identified. In addition, when the central head dies or leaves there’s an impact to the stock price and company. Is there a way to fix this dependency? DAOs emerged to address this issue.

Decentralized – Power lies in the community not with a single individual. Rules cannot be changed by single individual but by the community voting.

Autonomous – With on-chain governance, there is no human intervention, votes are tallied and decisions are implemented through smart contracts.

Organizations – entities that coordinate activities among stakeholders

The following captures the differences between the centralized and decentralized organizations.

Source: BlockchainHub

DAOs are fundamentally changing the ways the work is done. They remove the capital and human resource limitations by converting them to community ownership and machine contracts. The resources can reside anywhere in the world to contribute and get rewarded. There is no central authority and everyone has an equal say in the future or operational aspects of the project. While there are benefits of adopting the decentralized organizations, they also come with some challenges.

    1. It may be challenging to coordinate multiple decisions to be made initially when the project is kicked off. However over a period of time these will reduce and will be more manageable.
    2. Governance conflicts between shareholders, company managers and creditors. These cannot be resolved through the current legal framework and there is no entity that validates the smart contracts.
    3. There is a tradeoff done between scalability, security and decentralization for the blockchain. Security and decentralization may have some impact on scalability of the blockchain
    4. Security and economic are the biggest blockers for the growth of DAOs as the combined security and economic attack would render them useless.

However, there are tools like Discourse, Tally, Snapshot, Cybill etc.,  have emerged to solve the above challenges. The DAOs are great solution to mitigate the ills of centralized organizations but it is still in its infant stage. The tools, regulations and security breakthroughs will help grow DAOs and eventually be adopted across the board. One of the areas that has blossomed is the Decentralized Finance which we will review in detail next.

 

Part 2: Web 3.0 Applications

Web 3 is an internet owned by users and builders orchestrated with tokens. – Chris Dixon

In continuation of my previous post on Web 3.0, we will continue to explore the landscape. These are the components and let’s explore one at a time.

    • Web 3.0 applications – Community managed applications
    • Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) – Community owned governance
    • Decentralized Finance (DeFi) – Community Finance
    • Stable-coins and Central Bank Digital Currencies – Fiat collateralized and Government issue digital coins
    • Creator Economy & Non Fungible Tokens (NFTs) – Community creations
    • Blockchain based games – Community built, created and owned Games

Web 3.0 Applications:

During Web 1.0 era, we saw the open protocols of web itself like TCP, IP, SMTP and such. This openness enabled multiple companies build the eco system around it to make it useful to the end users. However, this changed when the world entered Web 2.0, where the companies like Google, Amazon and Microsoft built applications that are proprietary and monetized on them. The applications are highly centralized and don’t allow outsiders to make changes or enhance their applications. The companies don’t charge and mostly give the services for free, it’s not even their core offering and use the data insights to sell their products.

These will change in the Web 3.0, where the communities build and manage the applications decentralizing the services. Let’s see some examples on this is accomplished.

    • Bitcoin – The forerunner of all cryptocurrencies that is built on decentralized network concept where the community owns the development and maintenance of the ecosystem. At this point, we are looking at it as an application but not as a cryptocurrency (we will address it as part of DeFi later) that embodies Web 3.0 concept.
    • Diaspora – Application built as a decentralized social network where nodes are distributed across the world and the individual manages the contacts. (Courtesy Diaspora website). The community collectively owns the network and if one node goes down, the information is available on the other nodes providing redundancy. There is no central organization to manage and monetize. If the community decides to monetize, it would be put to vote and majority has to accept the proposal in order to be execute. Once approved, the community of developers build that enhancement and deploy it. Community users test and validate. Then the nodes are notified to accept the enhancement. The update trickles across the network. The changes are done at the consent of the users and nodes.                       Distributed network

Compare this to the following where the nodes are completely centralized like Facebook (courtesy Diaspora website). In this scenario, the network is owned by one entity i.e., Facebook. They build and manage the network. The data is owned by them and they can decide to utilize it in whatever manner without user’s acceptance (sure it is buried in the consent agreements which no one reads). If there is an enhancement, the corporation decides and hires developers to build, hires quality and user acceptance testers to undertake the testing, then deploy it to go live. For the end users, there is no control on how their information is used or whom the contacts are shared.

Centralized network

The above examples are used to demonstrate the mechanizations of the Web 3.0 applications. I try hard to have a neutral opinion in disseminating the information without any judgment. However, if any of the above undermines/promotes a concept it is purely coincidental and unintentional.

Part 1: Web 3.0, What Is It And Why It Matters!

“We believe that the next wave of computing innovation – along with entirely new sectors of the economy – will be built on decentralized technology. -Andersson Horowitz (a16z)”

These jargons Web 1.0, Web 2.0 and Web 3.0 are coined later not when the event happens. If you ask anyone in 1991 they wouldn’t know it was Web 1.o and only on the hindsight we give labels on the evolution. So with respect to Web 3.0, there are numerous examples of what it is depending the perspective of the authors and you find here and here and more. The reality is somewhere in between and in my opinion it is just decentralization (don’t get your pitchforks yet).

Recently, I presented an hour overview to my alma-mater where I spoke about the eco-system and its impact on the future of technology. In a series of posts, I would like to explore the Web 3.0 landscape.

The above image captures the essence of the web evolution. We began from the connected networks, read-only Web 1.0, evolved the social platforms controlling centralized content delivered from cloud to decentralized dApps and blockchain based solutions solving multiple use cases powered by a community.

Web 3.0 is not a single technology, hardware, or social concept. The landscape consists of the following:

    • Web 3.0 applications – Community managed applications
    • Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) – Community owned governance
    • Decentralized Finance (DeFi) – Community Finance
    • Stablecoins and Central Bank Digital Currencies – Fiat collateralized and Government issue digital coins
    • Creator Economy & Non Fungible Tokens (NFTs) – Community creations
    • Blockchain based games – Community built, created and owned Games

In the next post, we will continue to explore Web 3.0 landscape. Meanwhile, wishing everyone “Happy Easter”!